In California, when a life agent works with a member of the public, the agent is considered to represent:
Select an option to reveal the answer and the full 3-part explanation — free, no signup.
Answer & full 3-part explanation (select an option above, or peek)
Why A is correct
An insurance agent is the representative of the insurer. When soliciting or negotiating insurance, the agent acts for the insurer, and the insurer is generally bound by the agent's acts within the scope of the agent's authority. A broker, by contrast, represents the insured in dealing with insurers. In California, life and health business is conducted by agents, so the life agent represents the insurer in dealings with the public, while still being required to deal fairly and honestly with applicants. The agent is regulated by the state but acts for the insurer, not for the state.
Why the other options are wrong
- C) The applicant is represented by a broker in brokerage transactions. An agent represents the insurer with whom the agent has a relationship. This contradicts the governing rule explained above and therefore cannot be the correct answer.
- D) The agent does not represent both parties equally. The agent represents the insurer while owing the applicant a duty of fair dealing and good faith. The controlling legal standard set out above demonstrates precisely why this option is incorrect.
- B) The agent acts for the insurer, not for the state. The state regulates the agent's conduct but is not the party the agent represents. This choice misstates what the statute actually requires, so it must be eliminated from consideration.
Memory hook
Agent = insurer's arm. Broker = customer's advocate. Know whose hat you are wearing.